Required texts

The following required readings are available on Canvas.

1. Aslan, S., & Reigeluth, C. (2013). Leading Change for a New Paradigm of Education. TechTrends, 57(5), 18-24.
2. Beycioglu, K., & Kondakci, Y. (2021). Organizational Change in Schools. ECNU Review of Education, 4(4), 788–807. 
3. Boin, A., Bynander, F., Stern, E., & ‘t Hart, P .(2020). Leading in a crisis: organizational resistance and mega crisis, Retrieved from https://anzsog.edu.au/research-insights-and-resources/research/organisational-resilience-in-mega-crises/
4. Brown, B., Wang, T., Lee, M., & Childs, A  .(2023) Surviving, navigating and innovating through a pandemic: A review of research on school leadership during COVID-19 2020–2021.International Journal of Educational Development, 100.  
5. Cheng, Y. C., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Paradigm Shifts in Leadership for Learning: Hong Kong and the Asia-Pacific. Chair Professors – Public Lecture Series Leadership for 21st Century Schools: From Instructional Leadership to Leadership for Learning. The Hong Kong Institute of Education Asia Pacific Centre for Leadership and Change. Hong Kong. 
6. Coutts, N. (2016). Change, Culture and Cultural  Change in Education,  The Learner's Way, Retrieved from 
7. Dove, M. G., & Freeley, M. E. (2011). The Effects of Leadership on Innovative Program Implementation. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, Spring, 25-32.
8. Ehrhart, M. & Schneider, B. (2016). Organizational Climate and Culutre. Oxford Research Encylopedias,   
9. Fullan, M. (2007). Understanding Change. Leading in a Culture of Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
10. Fullan, M. (2007). Causes and Processes of Initiation. The New Meaning of Education Change (4th ed., pp. 64-83). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
11. Fullan, M. (2007). Causes and Processes of Implementation and Continuation. The New Meaning of Education Change (4th ed., pp. 84-106). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
12. Gaffney, M. (2014). Scaling Up and Drilling Down Pathways for Leading School System Improvement. Pathways to School System Improvement (1st ed., pp. 5-15). Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: ACER Press.
13. Kaufman, K., Mitra, S., Anderson, J., Coartney, J., & Cash, C. (2020). Leading Collaborative Change in Educational Organization, Jounal of Educational Leadership, 19  (4)  https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/100133/19_4_Kaufman.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
14. Schneider, B., Brief, A., & Guzzo, R.  (1996). Creating a Climate and Culture for Sustainable Organizational Change, Retrieved from
15. Reeves, D. (2006). Leading to Change / How Do You Change School Culture?  Educational Leadership, 64 (4), 92-94.
16. Todnem. R. (2020). Organizational Change and Leadership: Out of the Quagmire. Journal of Change Management. 20 (1), 1-6.       
17. Walker, A., & Qian, H. (2012). Reform Disconnection in China. Peabody Journal of Education, 87(2), 162-177.

18. Roberts, P. & Downes, N. (2019) The Rural Difference Trope: Leader Perceptions on Rural, Regional and Remote Schooling Difference. Leading & Managing, Vol. 25 (2), pp. 51-65. 

For Unit readings and resources in the 91Porn Library

(print materials)

(electronic materials)

Supplementary reading and further references

Barber, M. (2009). From system effectiveness to system improvement, in A. Hargreaves and M. Fullan (eds) Change Wars. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.

Crowther, F., Andrews, D., Morgan, A., & O'Neill, S. (2012). Hitting the Bullseye of School Improvement: The IDEAS Project at work in a successful school system. Leading and Managing.18 (2), 1-34.

Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. .(2010). How the World's Most Improved School Systems Keep Getting Better. McKinsey and Company. Retrieved from 

https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/education/our-insights/how-the-worlds-most-improved-school-

Section of Unit Outline Check points Checked by Peer Moderator (Y/N) systems-keep-getting-better

          Peng, C., Wang, B., & Schaubroek., J. (2020). Can Humble Leaders Get Results? The Indirect and Contextual Influences of Skip-Level LearCan Humble Leaders Get         Results?  The Indirect and Contextual Influences of Skip-Level Leaders. Journal of Leadership and Organisational Studies, 27 (4), 329-339.

Submission of assessment items

Extensions & Late submissions

Approval of extenuating circumstances will be dependent upon the production of supporting documentation and at the discretion of the unit convener.

All assessment items required to be submitted online must be submitted via the appropriate Canvas drop box. It is the student's responsibility to upload the correct and corresponding draft or assessment item to the right submission section. Assignments must be submitted in a format accessible to the assessor(s), as stated on the relevant canvas site. If the unit convener and/or tutor are unable to access a submission, or if no submission has been made by the due date and time, a standard late penalty of 10% of the total marks possible for the task may be applied per day, for three days, after which the submission will receive a score of ‘0' in keeping with UC's Assessment Policy.

Special assessment requirements

Normally an aggregate mark of 50% is required to pass the unit

Provision of valid documentation

Please note that the University takes student conduct very seriously. All documentation provided to University staff must be valid and the provision of fraudulent documentation carries with it potentially serious consequences, including suspension and/or exclusion from the University. Note that all allegations of student misconduct will be referred to the Associate Dean for Education (ADE) as a prescribed authority for investigation.

Students must apply academic integrity in their learning and research activities at UC. This includes submitting authentic and original work for assessments and properly acknowledging any sources used.

Academic integrity involves the ethical, honest and responsible use, creation and sharing of information. It is critical to the quality of higher education. Our academic integrity values are honesty, trust, fairness, respect, responsibility and courage.

UC students have to complete the annually to learn about academic integrity and to understand the consequences of academic integrity breaches (or academic misconduct).

UC uses various strategies and systems, including detection software, to identify potential breaches of academic integrity. Suspected breaches may be investigated, and action can be taken when misconduct is found to have occurred.

Information is provided in the Academic Integrity Policy, Academic Integrity Procedure, and 91Porn (Student Conduct) Rules 2023. For further advice, visit Study Skills.

Learner engagement

The workload for this unit is expected to be 150 hours:

1. Online reflections and engagement 15 hours

2. Attendance and engagement in workshops 25 hours

3. Prescribed readings and private study 50 hours

4. Research and assignment preparation 60 hours

Participation requirements

Your participation in both class and online activities will enhance your understanding of the unit content and therefore the quality of your assessment responses. Lack of participation may result in your inability to satisfactorily pass assessment items.

Required IT skills

Canvas is the delivery management tool for this unit. Basic computer literacy is assumed. 

Artificial intelligence services must not to be used for assessment or assessment preparation by students unless explicitly allowed in the assessment instructions for an assessment task published with the assessment task and/or in the unit outline. That is, an artificial intelligence services may only be used if:

• its use is authorised by the unit convener as part of a specified
  assessment task, and
• it is used in the way allowed in the assessment instructions and/or unit outline, and
• its use is appropriately referenced, meaning that students must reference the use of AI in their assessment in the same way as they reference other source material.

In-unit costs

N/A

Work placement, internships or practicums

Not applicable

Additional information

Provision of information to the group

Notifications through the Canvas Announcements Forum or the Canvas Discussion Forums are deemed to be made to the whole class.  It is the responsibility of the student to ensure that they check for announcements on the Unit's Canvas website (forum messages are also emailed to student email addresses only).  Students should ensure they check their student email regularly.  The Canvas discussion forums will be checked by staff regularly.

Use of student email account

The University Email policy states that "students wishing to contact the University via email regarding administrative or academic matters need to send the email from the University account for identity verification purposes".  Therefore all unit enquiries should be emailed using a student university email account. Students should contact servicedesk@canberra.edu.au if they have any issues accessing their university email account.

There are active researchers teaching this unit who are able to engage the students in deep and active learning and transmit to their students their passion for the research they are carrying out.  

Students who have not completed the AIM   Acacademic Integrity Model should do so before starting this unit 

• Period 4, 2024, Intensive, UCI - Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou (221713)
• Period 4, 2023, Intensive, UCI - Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou (220961)
• Period 1, 2023, Intensive, UCI - Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou (210780)
• Period 1, 2022, Intensive, UCI - Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou (205548)
• Period 1, 2021, Intensive, UCI - Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou (204354)
• Period 5, 2019, Intensive, UCI - Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou (192389)
• Period 2, 2018, Intensive, UCI - Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou (182807)